- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
- Author: Dan Maguire <danac6la@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 22:05:34 -0700
- Turns out that very subject was being kicked around on a recent qrz.com thread: https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/indirect-measurement-of-ground-constants-with-a-dipole.696955/ Dan, AC6LA ____
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-03/msg00082.html (7,504 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
- Author: Dan Maguire <danac6la@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 22:15:45 -0700
- I apologize. My previous post was meant to go to the Topband reflector, not to Towertalk. Dan, AC6LA _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-03/msg00083.html (6,644 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:30:40 -0700
- On 3/23/20 10:05 PM, Dan Maguire wrote: Grant wrote: If you really want to know the parameters, see antennasbyn6lf.com as Rudy describes techniques for ground RF properties measuring. Turns out that
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-03/msg00084.html (9,542 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:35:54 -0700
- This was pretty well studied by George Hagn at SRI in the 60s/70s in the context of antennas for field use of HF and VHF in Vietnam and there are some publications out there. In fact, that's what led
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-03/msg00085.html (8,014 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:47:53 -0700
- This was pretty well studied by George Hagn at SRI in the 60s/70s in the context of antennas for field use of HF and VHF in Vietnam and there are some publications out there. In fact, that's what led
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-03/msg00086.html (10,318 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:12:11 -0700
- For ham radio purposes, why not measure the effect of ground conductivity instead of the ground conductivity itself? As Jim Lux says, the conductivity isn't going to be uniform and since you can't m
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-03/msg00087.html (11,654 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu