Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+Horizontal\s+Loop\s+Performance\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+Horizontal\s+Loop\s+Performance\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Horizontal Loop Performance?? (score: 1): Author: "N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:12:08 -0500; Hi Ed An inv Vee is a resonant antenna and is interacting with the loop. The signal noise will be the same on both antennas. Only way to compare is removing the inv Vee. Regards Jose Carlos --Origina; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00084.html (10,562 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Horizontal Loop Performance?? (score: 1): Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:48:25 -0500 (EST); Hi Ed, First question is about the QTH, ground conditions. Close to salt water or sea of sand? That would help deciding on polarization. Inv Vee is not a bad performer and horizontal loop would have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00085.html (9,139 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Horizontal Loop Performance?? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:27:29 -0800; An inv Vee is a resonant antenna and is interacting with the loop. An 80m inverted V isn't going to affect a 160m loop very much.. The signal noise will be the same on both antennas. Only way to comp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00097.html (9,255 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Horizontal Loop Performance?? (score: 1): Author: Edward <navydude1962@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:57:44 +0300; Concur. Inv Vee only resonant on 80. Loop smokes on 40m. No regrets. Going to build Moxon for 20m. Still have to get license before I can transmit. My comparisons have been exclusively on receive. Wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00119.html (9,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]