Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Tuning\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+L\s+Tuning\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Inverted L Tuning Question (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:23:42 -1000; Interaction with the tower and beam may be changing the real SWR, or your instrument may be getting more RF from a near by MWBC station and giving you bad readings when the tower is connected. You ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00101.html (9,371 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Inverted L Tuning Question (score: 1): Author: "DAVID CUTHBERT" <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 03:03:00 -0700; Dick, I ran some simulations. There is very heavy coupling to the tower. That's not such a bad thing. The tower current is 180 out-of-phase with the inverted-L current. The GND return current is the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00102.html (11,832 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Inverted L Tuning Question (score: 1): Author: w3kl@w3kl.com; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:47:05 -0800 (PST); Interaction with the tower has nothing to do with tieing into the tower ground but coupling between the actual inv L and the tower itself. See my previous post on how to deal with this. 73, Jeff W; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00105.html (12,123 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]