Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+\"Electrical\s+Height\"\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+\"Electrical\s+Height\"\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:35:33 -0800; I need an education here... When the FCC gives the "Electrical Height" (in degrees) of a broadcast tower as 175.7 degrees, what does that mean? In this situation, I'm specifically talking about the (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00638.html (7,360 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:19:03 EST; I need an education here... When the FCC gives the "Electrical Height" (in degrees) of a broadcast tower as 175.7 degrees, what does that mean? In this situation, I'm specifically talking about the (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00643.html (8,563 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:12:28 -0500; Standard Time, of a broadcast (former) KFI tower in tower is about a believe that it is An additional note.. BC stations very quickly learned that 5/8th wave verticals were undesirable. They offered; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00646.html (9,415 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:20:03 -0500; Do AM-BC stations use ground radials? -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e {| /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \ {| ==\ # West Central Florida KD4E == http://bibleseven.com/steelhouse1.html Ham PC = 100% Linux Novell-S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00647.html (9,152 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:42:09 -0500; Some serious real estate! -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e {| /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \ {| ==\ # West Central Florida KD4E == http://bibleseven.com/steelhouse1.html Ham PC = 100% Linux Novell-Suse 9.2 Hall; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00649.html (8,846 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:54:01 -0500; Always. The only exception is over saltwater where they might just use a large screen. If they use 120 radials 1/4 wl long or longer they often don't need to run a complex efficiency full proof. FS; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00652.html (8,264 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower "Electrical Height"? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Mendelsohn, W2ML" <adam77@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:12:53 -0500; Do they ever! But ground mats combined with "the stick" have to form a pattern as coverage is a function of the coverage area granted by their FCC license. Having worked on WABC-AM, a 50 KW clear cha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00665.html (8,889 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]