Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Consult\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Consult\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: "Dick, W1KSZ" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:03:05 -0400; I recently retired and am planning to re-locate to Tucson, AZ (from Lexington, MA). I am in the enviable position of rebuilding the shack and putting up a new antenna system. At present, I have narro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00495.html (7,599 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:33:45 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I like the free-standing approach. I don't like guy wires because I don't trust them and they need regular watching and possibly maintenance. A free-standing tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00496.html (7,351 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: "Gedas" <w8bya@mchsi.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:00:31 -0400; Hi Dick, I really enjoy not having to climb my Universal towers. I made all 3 of mine fold-over at the bottom via a hand winch, pullies and some parallel (stacked) 6x6 posts in cement. One at 80', on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00497.html (8,945 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:26:26 -0500 (CDT); Dick: I went with a self-supporting Trylon myself six years ago. I had almost no choice but to go with a non-guyed tower; my back yard is very small and the guys would have been draped over the house; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00498.html (8,908 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:57:36 -0400; Hey Dick, I beat you to retirement! Ive been up a free standing Universal tower ONCE and I'll never do it again. As you know Ive been climbing since I was a teenager and as high as 650' but Ive never; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00499.html (9,621 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:12:34 -0400; I'm not sure that you need 3 sets of guys with an 80' Rohn 45g tower. I think two sets is enough and if you wanted more strength you could upgrade to Rohn 55g. I have owned several Universal towers f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00502.html (8,174 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:20:46 -0400; It basically depends on what you want to do, how much room you have and how good a shape you are in. That's quite a wind load. The 45 G is very solid and roomy enough for two to easily work at the sa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00503.html (9,618 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult (score: 1): Author: N4BAA - Jose Castillo <n4baa@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:36:51 +0000; Not much of a wind load to tell you the truth... I have a 5L 20M mono on 44 foot boom and a 2L 30/2L 40 above that 12 feet on a CM mast...NO worries I assure you even with 19 SQ feet of antenna up th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00504.html (10,482 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]