Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Foundation\s+Inspections\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Foundation\s+Inspections\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation Inspections (score: 1): Author: Gene K5GS <k5gs@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 07:36:51 -0700; Having just been through the tower permitting process in Pima County, Arizona I would offer the following: UST HDX-572: If you need a building permit AND the project needs to be inspected by a licens; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00032.html (8,971 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation Inspections (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 10:14:15 -0700; A bit of history about towers in Pima County. When I put up my tower all that was required, if anything, was a zoning/land use permit. The county basically wanted to know that if it fell down it woul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00033.html (10,852 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation Inspections (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 02:22:23 +0000; ridge in the Tucson Mountains on the west edge of town. All entirely legal, but the Tucson Mountain Homeowners' Association, which has no legal standing but does have a lot of politically connected; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00037.html (8,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]