Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Regalvanize\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Regalvanize\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:32:48 -0400; A short time ago, I had some tower sections regalvanized. They were not in bad shape, but I thought I would recoat them before installing the tower, thinking I would have a tower that looked new agai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00750.html (7,810 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:50:59 -0700; Would that be ANSI/ASTM A 123/A123M-02? {Standard Specification for Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on Iron and Steel Products) To be a bit of a smart-a, have them show you in the spec where it's; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00754.html (8,715 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:12:28 -0700; Found a copy of the spec.. the spec says "smooth finish" It says rework is allowed for not more than 1/2 of 1% of the surface area or some number of square inches per ton. There's several ways of doi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00756.html (8,582 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:04:01 -0700; Tell them there is also an ANSI spec that prohibits voids in the galvanizing for structural members. Ask them to show you that spec and convince you they complied with it. The only one I found online; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00757.html (9,743 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: "Sadtip" <sad.tip@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:32:44 -0400; If you can't get any satisfaction from them I would definitely contact the BBB (better Business Bureau) to see if they have had any other complaints. Just my .02 worth RoD KD0XX A good friend will co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00758.html (10,036 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:03:35 -0400; My 45G had so many spurs and sharp edges right from the factory it added new meaning to the phrase, "climbing a tower may be hazardous to your health". I didn't dare climb without wearing leather gl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00760.html (11,239 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Regalvanize (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:19:38 -0700; So it, obviously, didn't conform to the ASTM spec (which actually refers to handling safety, among other things in the discussion about finish quality). But then, I suspect that Rohn didn't call out; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00762.html (9,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]