Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+antenna\s+decisions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+antenna\s+decisions\s*$/: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:29:58 -0500; Jim and Steve, Thank you gentlemen. One gets all kinds of advice and much misinformation from the community at large but this forum seems a cut above. I appreciate getting reasonable answers to my qu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00463.html (18,022 bytes)
62. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:09:21 -0400 (EDT); wires ?? You're supposed to drop them. When does that ever sound like a good idea?!? Never in my book. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH _______________________________________________ ________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00467.html (8,556 bytes)
63. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:17:26 -0700; That just makes a better reason to have a crank-up/tilt-over. More money but a lot safer. Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00468.html (8,899 bytes)
64. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:33:37 -0400 (EDT); Hi All, the Hazer system is a good option for 40 ft or less 25G towers. That height is safe without any guys with little or no wind load. While the tower is safe with the system lowered, one should n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00471.html (9,839 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 64
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]