Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+111\,\s+Issue\s+30\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+111\,\s+Issue\s+30\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 111, Issue 30 (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:10:41 -0400 (EDT); good wind load rating, 18 sq ft at 3' above the tower, Rohn limits the boom length to 10'. 10/15/20 meter beam with a VHF/UHF vertical on top. Wind load wise this may not exceed the load rating of t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00224.html (7,954 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 111, Issue 30 (score: 1): Author: Kelley <kshaddrick@jetup.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:49:41 -0500; As I mentioned in my post, the antennas listed are what I would LIKE to put up. They are not up on the 48' HDBX as I know it won't support it. No warning required. The tower currently has an Cushcraf; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00228.html (8,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]