Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+159\,\s+Issue\s+64\-\s+30\/40M\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+159\,\s+Issue\s+64\-\s+30\/40M\s+dipole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 159, Issue 64- 30/40M dipole (score: 1): Author: HankP <pfizenmayer@q.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:47:39 -0400 (EDT); Paul-- I think it can be done a LOT easier than relays - I saw a suggestion for a trap - that can definitely be done - look at OPTIBEAM 30-40 M dipole - I have a M squared 40M1L linear loaded 40 M di; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00310.html (9,874 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 159, Issue 64- 30/40M dipole (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:59:11 -0400; Hank, thanks for the input. I didn't like my relay idea but when I wrote that post I hadn't yet seen a workable alternative aside from full size parallel tubing dipoles for each band. I could do that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00327.html (10,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]