Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+168\,\s+Issue\s+64\s+raised\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+168\,\s+Issue\s+64\s+raised\s+radials\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 168, Issue 64 raised radials (score: 1): Author: Marv Shelton <marvs@att.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 11:00:00 -0800; Elevated radials. I know all the science is good (I am an engineer after all) but what I found easiest to do when I constructed my 160m inverted-L was to attach a 500' spool of wire to the base and r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00289.html (7,881 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 168, Issue 64 raised radials (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:37:13 -0800; Just to clarify -- the primary reason for adding more radials is to reduce ground loss. N6LF has shown that 1) the more equally the current divides between radials, the lower the total loss will be;; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00290.html (10,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]