Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Trees\s+and\s+loss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Trees\s+and\s+loss\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Trees and loss (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:18:19 -0800; You'd really need to model the branches on the tree as well. A nice "further work for the student" would be to take the QST model and add horizontal branches, then run it with some horizontal dipole; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00007.html (8,889 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Trees and loss (score: 1): Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:14:03 -0500; Back in the 70's, I did a project comparing the optical cross section a lot of different growing things - mostly trees - to their radar cross section at various frequencies, UHF and up. You can proba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00008.html (10,737 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]