Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UL\s+Warns\s+of\s+Countefeit\s+Ground\s+Rods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UL\s+Warns\s+of\s+Countefeit\s+Ground\s+Rods\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] UL Warns of Countefeit Ground Rods (score: 1): Author: "Larry & Karen" <k0is@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:24:13 -0600; My wife, a EE/P.E. forwarded this to me just today. http://www.mikeholt.com:80/newsletters.php?action=display&letterID=644&email=kaatnip@qconline.com _______________________________________________ _; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00146.html (7,331 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] UL Warns of Countefeit Ground Rods (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:29:00 -0800; interesting.. I wouldn't have thought that it would be worthwhile to counterfeit something like this. Of course, since a rod can't be your primary ground in new construction (see 2005 or 2008 code),; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00147.html (7,981 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] UL Warns of Countefeit Ground Rods (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:40:11 -0500; I'm just wondering why would I care whether my ground system has real UL rods or not. And now days what would be the primary ground? Neutral from the pole? Neutral from the pole ties to the panel gro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00151.html (7,898 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] UL Warns of Countefeit Ground Rods (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:36:19 -0800; At least in the 2005 code, there's no particular requirement for the rod to be UL (you can use pretty much any sort of metal you want, galvanized pipe, for instance). The copper cladding is for corro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00159.html (10,007 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]