Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UST\s+72\'\s+Crankup\s+Tower\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UST\s+72\'\s+Crankup\s+Tower\s+Question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] UST 72' Crankup Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:28:11 -0800 (GMT-08:00); I'm looking at the possibility of picking up a used US Tower 72' Crankup tower. The current owner (not a ham) inherited it with a home purchase, and wants to sell it as he has no use for it. He doesn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00152.html (8,030 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] UST 72' Crankup Tower Question (score: 1): Author: John Elsik <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:45:14 -0700; Look on the US Towers web site. They have the widths of the top and bottom sections listed.> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:28:11 -0800> From: larryj@teleport.com> To: towertalk@contesting.com> Subject: [; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00154.html (8,273 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] UST 72' Crankup Tower Question (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:52:07 -0800; The HDX-572 uses the bottom 4 sections of the 89' tower. So yes, the base section is the next size bigger than the TX-472. I just swapped out one for the other in Anaheim, but I don't know the actual; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00155.html (8,445 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] UST 72' Crankup Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:07:40 -0800 (GMT-08:00); LJ --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00156.html (10,191 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] UST 72' Crankup Tower Question (score: 1): Author: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:53:15 -0800; Measure the face width of the bottom section of the tower. The TX-472 is 21-5/8" and the HDX-572 is 25-5/8". 73, Clay W7CE _______________________________________________ ___________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00157.html (8,259 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] UST 72' Crankup Tower Question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:44:42 EST; tower. The current owner (not a ham) inherited it with a home purchase, and wants to sell it as he has no use for it. He doesn't know if it's the "Standard" model TX-472 or the "Heavy-duty" model HDX; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00160.html (8,513 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]