Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UT\-141\s+terminating\s+conn\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UT\-141\s+terminating\s+conn\s+Question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] UT-141 terminating conn Question (score: 1): Author: <wayg@cape-vision.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:24:14 -0700; Hi, I have a friend working on a project that involves terminating to a female SMA from UT-141 semi-rigid coax. The only connector he was able to fInd was at Digi-Key, cost $20, and they only had one; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00037.html (7,147 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] UT-141 terminating conn Question (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:59:01 -0700; Solder, I assume, not crimp, since you'd need the tooling Male is more common on cables. Are you sure your friend needs a female jack on the cable? Pasternack has them for about $5-6 PE4008 for the m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00039.html (8,102 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] UT-141 terminating conn Question (score: 1): Author: Geoffrey Way <wayg@cape-vision.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:01:32 -0400; Thanks for your reply, Jim. Definitely solder rather than crimp. The application is in the hundreds of Megahertz, so impedance "lumps", losses, and match are all a definite concern. I'll check out th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00052.html (7,135 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] UT-141 terminating conn Question (score: 1): Author: WB3EXR <wb3exr@triad.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:47:51 -0400; Good evening, The male connectors run around $5.00 each (stainless steel nut) ... I'll have to get the information tomorrow at work. UT-141 is also known as RG-400 under the C17 specification ... try; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00065.html (7,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]