Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ultimate\s+tower\/antenna\s+system\s+\?\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ultimate\s+tower\/antenna\s+system\s+\?\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ultimate tower/antenna system ??????? (score: 1): Author: prforbes@tbsa.com.au (Peter Forbes); Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 23:47:11 -0500 (EST); Fellow DXers I have yet to see any of the "so called" ultimate systems make provision for the WARC bands, namely 10, 18 and 24 mhz. The problem arises that when you start to put these 3 frequency ran; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00331.html (7,700 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Ultimate tower/antenna system ??????? (score: 1): Author: k1nu@mediaone.net (Leonard Kay); Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 06:50:57 -0500; I know of at least one ham who has used stacked LPs (a pair of T10s). How about that for a start? Len K1NU for a bands. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towerta; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00333.html (8,926 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Ultimate tower/antenna system ??????? (score: 1): Author: millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller); Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:59:26 -0500 (EST); Yes, but the original post asked the following: Adding WARC band antennas to the system would not result in the most contest competitive solution due to the antenna interactions noted previously and; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00335.html (7,953 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Ultimate tower/antenna system ??????? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:42:32 +0000; bands. Peter's comment raises a key point ... "ultimate" for WHAT PURPOSE? 73, Pete Smith N4ZR n4zr@contesting.com Sometimes a tower is just a tower -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00336.html (8,136 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]