- 1. [TowerTalk] Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:19:31 -0500
- OK Tower Talkers. I need wisdom and guidance. I am finally in a position to start building my retirement station meaning a BIG upgrade in the tower and antenna department. Here is my plan. 70? AN Wir
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00261.html (8,701 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:38:08 -0400
- This load equals 39 sqft projected area including exposed mast. About 75% of the tower rating at 100 mph. I live in an 80mph zone. Have the load checked by a professional engineer. Most towers are sp
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00262.html (9,534 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Mike DeChristopher <mfdechristopher@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:24:42 +0000
- Hi, If you're already looking at the Mid-Tri, consider the Mid-Tri-40. Separate feedline for 40 and saves you some windload and mast space. See: https://jkantennas.com/jkmidtri.html Mike N1TA _______
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00263.html (7,286 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Timothy Coker via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 03:56:58 +0000 (UTC)
- Id echo Mikes statements. I have both the Mid Tri and the Mid Tri w/40m on my tower along with the 801T at the top of my mast. The 402T is a design Im considering for my next tower project if I dont
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00264.html (9,449 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:36:38 -0500
- Kevin, Consider the JK Mid-Tri/40. You'll have less load, spend less, and have an antenna with the 40/15M interaction already worked out without the need for you to model it. Performance will be
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00270.html (10,118 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu