Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Variable\s+phasing\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Stacking\s+on\s+separate\s+towers\,\s+take\s+off\s+angles\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:45:49 -0400
I've been trying to remember specifics about a phasing system that was sold commercially for a few years back in the 70s or 80s. It used two verticals and, depending on settings on the desktop, could
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00225.html (9,912 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:02:55 -0700
On 3/18/13 3:45 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: I've been trying to remember specifics about a phasing system that was sold commercially for a few years back in the 70s or 80s. It used two verticals and,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00226.html (10,449 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:32:13 -0400
Here's the patent: http://www.google.com/patents?id=_WU6AAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&client=internal-uds#v=onepage&q&f=false 73, Roger Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: I've been trying to remember specifi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00227.html (11,104 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:50:30 -0700
http://www.google.com/patents?id=_WU6AAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&client=internal-uds#v=onepage&q&f=false Interesting.. The antenna compendium article had a continously variable shifter (actuall
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00229.html (9,834 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:17:40 -0700
Artical in the Antenna Compendium Vol. 2 written by W5AH who worked for the company that sold them. He is a regular on TT. It switched in various lengths of feed line plus a RF transformer to get 180
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00235.html (11,137 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:00:00 -0400
I built a "Phase Box" with sections 2, 4, and 8 feet long. It can be used to vary the "phase" between two antennas - e.g. vertical arrays or stacked arrays, and also as a "Line Flattener" when using
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00238.html (13,471 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Variable phasing was: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles? (score: 1)
Author: "W8BYA" <w8bya@mchsi.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:01:16 -0400
Jim is right. I used a simple variable L network to create the required phase shift to convert my CC XM-240 into a rotatable, phased array that works really well. There's a Youtube video of me runnin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00242.html (10,749 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu