Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\?\?\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: don@kcnet.com (Don Nutt); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 21:20:45 -0600; I would like to add that I have not had needed to guy my HF2V until I changed the bottom insulator. I replaced the Fiber resin (I believe it's G12) rod with a teflon rod. I found it to be a weak poin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00432.html (12,927 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 02:51:48 GMT; I have a Butternut as my only antenna. I used it for quite a while with NO radials, it worked fine but it swr were a little high. I have seen it bent over passed 45 degrees in a storm and it came rig; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00433.html (10,327 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 22:55:59 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Guy, I'm not knocking no-radial antennas. Many people have limited room or don't want to go through the work to use radials. They don't mind five dB here and there o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00434.html (11,463 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:17:37 -0700; For my purposes, the GAP did a good job. I'm not saying it's the best around, however. I didn't care for its performance on 80 either, but it wasn't a band I spent much time on anyway so I didn't pus; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00435.html (10,102 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 20:22:38 -0700; <snip> (snip) I asked Roger Cox of Hygain whether putting radials under a DX-77 vertical (also a vertical dipole) would be of any benefit. He said NO. 73 Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@it; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00436.html (10,211 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike); Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 06:48:31 +0000; I don't know anything about the others but the HF2V by butternut is a fairly decent antenna for 40 and 80. And rugged as heck! In the last bad windstorm (the one that showed who had the toughest towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00440.html (9,510 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 08:28:35 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Not speaking of Roger, who I personally like.... I've observed over the years most vertical manufacturers promote two radials cut for each band, or a few ground rods, a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00443.html (11,566 bytes)
28. [TowerTalk] Vertical? (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 15:09:24 -0700; Hi Tom. You know, a single ground rod gives a great SWR reading and makes the vertical real broadbanded with all the ground loss. For some people, that is the main thing they are after. When radials; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00444.html (8,456 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]