Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+Antennas\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: carlau@iname.com (carlau@iname.com); Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:46:38 -0500 (EST); I'm looking for a good antenna system for 80 meters. I have visited: 1) the site of gladiator (http://www.primenet.com/~bmyers/) where they speak of a four sqare arrays. 2) the site of Titanex (http:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00934.html (7,641 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 12:22:52 -0500; Hi Carlau, speak of a four sqare arrays. First, let me say they both seem to be good verticals. The Unihat is another one, although it seems to have problems handling high power. But you asked how th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00937.html (9,268 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: n5nug@ix.netcom.com (---EAG---); Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 20:40:22 -0600; Hello Tom, the high power problems have been resolved for sometime now with the design. Those who do experience failures are running well in excess of the 1.5kw rated power specifications with the bi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00964.html (7,317 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: "Marcus Crahan" <mcrahan@powerengineering.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:23:56 -0800; I would like to receive some feedback from anyone who has operated HF with a vertical trap type antenna (Hustler) compared with a no-trap vertical (Butternut). Installation is near Pacific Ocean, 15; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00525.html (7,633 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 19:56:32 EST; Well, you could always read our HF vertical comparison report. Now you can read an unbiased report on how they really performed. Antennas tested include the Cushcraft R8, Butternut HF6V, MFJ 1798, Fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00526.html (7,513 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:39:30 -0600; Hi, Lee; Base loaded verticals work, of course. It may be easier to lower the losses associated with short antennas with top loading, such as the "T" or the inverted L. Top hats work well, too, but t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00519.html (7,799 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: kb0fhp@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:00:44 +0000; Lee: Take a look at the 80M vertical I built with a capacitance hat...simple, but works. http//home.comcast.net/~kb0fhp Scott _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list To; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00530.html (8,094 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]