Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+Lightning\s+Protection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+Lightning\s+Protection\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical Lightning Protection (score: 1): Author: "William B. Stacy" <wstacy@wildblue.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:48:11 -0500; I am going to install a series-fed, full-sized vertical for 160 in a few weeks. What I would like to find out is the preferred method of lightning protection (that is, shunting it to ground). There s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00624.html (6,717 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical Lightning Protection (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:04:14 -0400; "What I would like to find out is the preferred method of lightning protection (that is, shunting it to ground). There seem to be two methods: a spark gap, and a shunt coil" For what it's worth, if y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00626.html (7,496 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical Lightning Protection (score: 1): Author: "Kent Winrich" <kwinrich@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:26:58 -0400; Being in the broadcast industry, I would say BOTH. There are so many times when the spark gap saved my transmitters. It will spark even with a strike miles away. IMHO the choke will bleed off the slo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00646.html (8,664 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]