Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+for\s+a\s+50\'\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+for\s+a\s+50\'\s+tower\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical for a 50' tower (score: 1): Author: "W1JCW" <W1JCW@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:17:44 -0500; Hey guys - I was looking for opinions of what current production vertical would work well for tower installation. I need 80m - 10m coverage. I know a dipole would work better but the folks don't want; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00156.html (7,524 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for a 50' tower (score: 1): Author: "Dave Tipton, W5DMT" <dave@w5dmt.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:31:19 -0500; A Gap Titan might work well in that situation. 80-10 coverage, no radials, just a fixed counterpoise and basically, it's designed as a vertical dipole.. Ground mounted, I've never been a huge fan of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00157.html (8,382 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for a 50' tower (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:45:00 -0700; Hi John I would think the HyGain Hy Tower would probably be the best vertical out there. Kinda spendy, though, 73 Tom W7WHY Hey guys - I was looking for opinions of what current production vertical w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00158.html (7,729 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for a 50' tower (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:46:06 -0400; Hi John - My two cents worth, just to keep the thread alive. I go the wire/450 ohm feeder/tuner route since it all fits easily in a suitcase along with a little radio, switching PS and a TU. My rule; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00159.html (9,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]