Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+in\s+the\s+swamp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+in\s+the\s+swamp\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:50:45 -0400; Does anyone have any experience with putting up an 80 or 40 meter vertical in a swamp? I have a swamp of about an acre and a half that contains rather thick undergrowth and trees that are old but not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00235.html (7,229 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:36:36 -0500; Does anyone have any experience with putting up an 80 or 40 meter vertical in a swamp? I have a swamp of about an acre and a half that contains rather thick undergrowth and trees that are old but not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00236.html (8,790 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: "W2WHP" <w2whp.bsa.ny@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:47:42 -0400; We have a swamp area at the Wm H Pouch ham station W2WHP. It's not easy to use for antennas but the fantastic performance more then makes up for it. Over the past few years we have had a single wire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00238.html (9,660 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:24:33 -0700; The Tesla Amateur Radio club guys, with a web presence, and incredible antenna farm pictures, could probably offer first hand experience on the niceties of a swamp, or slough based HF station. Google; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00239.html (12,079 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 23:26:00 -0400; A guy in our Friday ham radio lunch bunch has some antennas in and over a swamp and he swears they work great down there. ///////////// Richards - K8JHR /////////////// == putting up an 80 or 40 mete; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00241.html (7,756 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 23:43:52 -0700; Based on my experience and those of some neighbors in dense redwood forests, I'd say verticals will work well on 80M and 160, and probably on the other HF bands. Expect absorption to increase drastic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00245.html (8,580 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: "Carrington, Walter" <Walter.Carrington@umassmed.edu>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:18:40 -0400; Is swamp water conductive? Fresh water swamps have a lot of stuff suspended or dissolved in the water. The conductivity might be much higher than pure water. A quick google: Great Salt Lake = 158,000; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00248.html (8,760 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:46:49 -0400; Thanks for the info Walter. My swamp is located in North eastern Wisconsin. No salt around the area. I may put a vertical in there or beside it and give it a try. It of course would be much easier to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00249.html (10,761 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:46:12 -0700; For the area right in the neighborhood of the antenna (say, within one antenna height), the conductivity is important. Farther away, it's the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) that's more i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00251.html (9,714 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:05:21 -0700; This depends largely on the QTH. Everglades water tends to be brackish, while water in the Louisiana swamps more fresh. My experience with a HyGain 14AVQ in Miami in the 70s was very good, no matter; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00252.html (12,075 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:46:38 -0700; I think that's exactly what I was driving at... it's not the conductivity as the fact that water makes a great reflector, fresh or salt. _______________________________________________ ______________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00256.html (9,376 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Bob Smith <na6t@na6t.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:34:32 -0700; HI Pat et All, I 'googled' the Tesla Amateur Radio Club and didn't get a hit. I found the Tesla Radio Club located in NJ, but no pictures? can you give me a link? thanks, Bob NA6T Robert Smith Consul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00304.html (10,292 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in the swamp (score: 1): Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:51:52 -0700; HI Pat et All, I 'googled' the Tesla Amateur Radio Club and didn't get a hit. I found the Tesla Radio Club located in NJ, but no pictures? can you give me a link? thanks, Bob NA6T Sure Bob, Here were; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00305.html (9,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]