Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+safety\s+protection\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+safety\s+protection\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical safety protection? (score: 1): Author: Jim Miller <jim@jtmiller.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 09:34:57 -0400; How are folks providing safety protection for towers which are shunt fed for 160m? I'm speaking here of protection from physical contact. It would seem that a chain link fence would interfere with pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00079.html (7,415 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical safety protection? (score: 1): Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 09:43:56 -0400; I have 2 hives of honey bees about 70 feet from the base... ;-) But, I do live on a farm so that affects my decision. In a more urban location, a wood fence would be a rf-transparent solution. 73, ge; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00080.html (7,771 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical safety protection? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 10:13:35 -0400; Hello Jim: I have wrapped the tower base with flexible plastic fence (about 5 feet tall) - held in place using ty wraps. Inexpensive, no harm to RF and works great. 73, Tim K3LR How are folks providi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00082.html (8,589 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical safety protection? (score: 1): Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 09:37:45 -0500; The voltage at the bottom of a grounded tower shunt fed at 60 feet or so would be low in my estimation. I'll send my dog over to sniff it out. :-) Chuck W5PR _________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00083.html (7,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]