Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+W\-51\s+wind\s+load\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+W\-51\s+wind\s+load\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] W-51 wind load (score: 1): Author: Neil <neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:48:10 -0500; Good morning, Can someone shed some light on why Tashijan tower's WT-51 is rated for 13 sq. ft. of load for 3 second gust @ 85 mph, while my Triex W-51 is only rated for 9 sq. ft. of antenna load @ 5; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00005.html (6,999 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] W-51 wind load (score: 1): Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x1@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:11:57 -0800; Neil: The WT-51 is the tower Tashijan sells and the W-51 is the old Triex design. First off the old Triex was designed using "fastest mile" wind velocity and the old UBC. The newer WT-51 design confo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00006.html (8,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]