Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+WARC\s+beam\s+above\s+a\s+tribander\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+WARC\s+beam\s+above\s+a\s+tribander\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] WARC beam above a tribander (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:34:47 -0800; I am planning on getting Force 12's WARC 2/2 and mounting it on the mast above my C3. I am waiting for Force 12 to respond to my email about their recommended space between them. I would like to hear; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00121.html (6,725 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] WARC beam above a tribander (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:16:38 -0500; I don't know about the 2 - 2, but the new WARC-7 can be mounted about 3 feet above the C19 XR tribander. With the old WARC-7 it was listed at 12 feet, but I know of one that was mounted about 6 or 8; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00125.html (7,790 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] WARC beam above a tribander (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:25:16 -0800; Roger, That is encouraging. Their specs show that all their antennas are similar in design, open sleeve etc., so it is likely I may be able to have a 3 foot spacing as you indicate with the WARC-7 an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00128.html (8,812 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] WARC beam above a tribander (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:52:22 -0800; I learned that tower talk doesnt take attachments. If anyone is interested in the chart from Force 12 showing the data for stacking a WARC beam over a tribander at various distances email me directly; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00142.html (9,241 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]