Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+WRTC\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+WRTC\s+antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] WRTC antennas (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:27:30 -0400; Were those really Force 12 C-3s, or clones? The antenna packages in the photo gallery are labeled "C-3", but... -- 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststatio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00182.html (6,857 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] WRTC antennas (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:13:11 -0400; the station description on the WRTC web page lists them as a HF-37, whatever that is....whatever they were, they rocked on 20m !!!!! On Mon 07/12/10 7:27 AM , Pete Smith n4zr@contesting.com sent: Wer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00183.html (7,856 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] WRTC antennas (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:43:08 -0500; Hi Pete, They were Russian made clones. They worked very well - the exact same as the real C3 antenna I had up for Field Day when we tested our entire setup (200 lbs of gear) before leaving to go to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00235.html (8,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]