Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+Rohn\s+45\s+Top\s+Section\s+is\s+Best\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+Rohn\s+45\s+Top\s+Section\s+is\s+Best\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Which Rohn 45 Top Section is Best? (score: 1): Author: Rob Frohne <frohro@wallawalla.edu>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:48:24 -0700; Hi Gentlemen: I have to choose a top section for my Rohn 45 installation, for a quad being turned by a prop pitch. The 45AG4 (with the flat top) looks not as beefy as the other one (45AG2 I think) to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00353.html (8,290 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Which Rohn 45 Top Section is Best? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <k7sv@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:14:55 -0400; Rob, If you contemplate the need to stand on top of the tower, you certainly want to go with the flat AG4. You'll need a thrust bearing with the AG4 while it's not necessary with the AG2. Something I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00376.html (7,409 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Which Rohn 45 Top Section is Best? (score: 1): Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:16:39 -0500; Rob - I've successfully used the flat top sections for over 30 years with various antenna/mast combinations. I'm currently using a 45AG4 on my 120ft tower to turn a Force 12 Magnum 240N 40-meter beam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00382.html (9,959 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Which Rohn 45 Top Section is Best? (score: 1): Author: hdmc38@bellsouth.net; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:58:01 +0000; Hello Rob I would and use the 45AG4.True about the bracing but that does not seem to effect the strength of it, on mine any way. You will need a thust bearing and it sure is easy to stand on! The 45A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00396.html (10,052 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]