Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+galvanized\s+crank\s+up\s+cables\s+instead\s+of\s+stainless\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:27:17 -0700
Having just replaced my crank up cables (in case they might be rusted internally), I am wondering why stainless steel cables aren't used. It would seem that they would avoid the latent rust issue. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00083.html (7,862 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 19:38:05 -0700
That's the problem rick, they would be sized considerably larger. I have never seen SS cables in any professional applications except in the food industry where corrosive wash down equipment is used.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00084.html (9,077 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 23:48:25 -0400
The original version of the military AB-577 crank-up mast used 1/8" stainless steel guy cables. Very nice kit. 73, Dick WC1M _______________________________________________ __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00088.html (10,164 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 23:58:59 -0400
I think stainless cable may be considerably more susceptible to bending fatigue. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00089.html (7,877 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:27:46 -0400 (EDT)
be rusted internally), I am wondering why stainless steel cables aren't used. It would seem that they would avoid the latent rust issue. I realize that they are not as strong, but they could simply
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00100.html (8,686 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: k2qmf@juno.com
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:45:59 -0400
HI rick, You can order SS cables for Tri-Ex towers from the manufacturer. They are more expensive and they are the next diameter size up from the regular cables. I have SS cables on my LM-470 tower w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00105.html (9,607 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:58:57 -0400
be rusted internally), I am wondering why stainless steel cables aren't used. It would seem that they would avoid the latent rust issue. I realize that they are not as strong, but they could simply b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00113.html (10,849 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Why galvanized crank up cables instead of stainless? (score: 1)
Author: "Georgens, Tom" <Tom.Georgens@netapp.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:27:15 +0000
Rick I have an HG52SS in Barbados and I have switched to stainless cables with no issue. The galvanized cables would only last a couple of years before there was enough rust to cause concern. I will
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00115.html (10,567 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu