Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+lambast\s+Rohn\s+\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+lambast\s+Rohn\s+\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: ddjones@nas.com (Dale Jones K5MM); Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 10:22:40 -0600; Gerald & others: This issue of lambasting Rohn for not sharing data that they may have is interesting. From my perspective, if I were Rohn Company, or the owner of that company, I would do exactly wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00203.html (11,452 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: perring@texas.net (Bob Perring); Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 13:01:24 -0600; is owner of == etc.==> Well, for what it's worth; N5RP Thinking, as follows: ........................ To my mind, the manufacturing of towers is sort of like making ladders and chain saws, only worse; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00204.html (8,755 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 14:05:13 EST; protecting door. Hi, Dale -- All excellent comments with a ring of truth in them. I've said this before - tower companies are insurance driven. That is, their insurance costs are their biggest cost.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00205.html (8,287 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 19:52:27 +0800; Hi All. I don't understand this statement! If I buy a tower and it falls across my neighbors house, why is Rohn responsible? It's like saying anyone who buys a car and drives it into a power pole sho; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00206.html (8,316 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:35:45 EST; That's why! 73, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00207.html (7,454 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 05:45:38 -0800; No, but if the car had a defect which caused you to louse control, thereby hitting the power pole, you'd have a just claim. And if Rohn is withholding information ( and I neither imply nor suggest s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00209.html (8,110 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 07:10:08 -0800 (PST); Hi Gang, Dale brings up some interesting points, but there are other points of view, as well . . . I am sure Rohn considers their publication strategy very carefully and everything they publish or de; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00231.html (13,684 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Why lambast Rohn ????? (score: 1): Author: bigdon@eskimo.com (Big Don); Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 03:25:44 -0800; I bought some reject fiberglass pole-vaulting poles from the manufacturer to build a big quad. The company made me submit a letter to them certifying that I abso-GODDAM-lutely wasn't *ever* going to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00238.html (8,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]