Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+no\s+apparent\s+use\s+of\s+2\"\s+shaft\s+collars\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Why\s+no\s+apparent\s+use\s+of\s+2\"\s+shaft\s+collars\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Why no apparent use of 2" shaft collars? (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:34:57 -0700; This is not re-opening the "thrust bearing vs rotor supporting the weight" thread. Questions are slightly different. I have two crankups with 7 1/4" bolt to bolt holes for thrust bearing, so ponderin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00526.html (9,147 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]