Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wilson\s+Crankup\s+Tubular\s+Tower\s+Info\s+Request\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wilson\s+Crankup\s+Tubular\s+Tower\s+Info\s+Request\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Wilson Crankup Tubular Tower Info Request (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:20:25 -0700 (GMT-07:00); I have a chance to pick up what appears to be a Wilson crankup tubular tower from a local estate sale - it looks like it has three - tubular telescoping sections. After looking through the Towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00102.html (8,189 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wilson Crankup Tubular Tower Info Request (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 12:59:29 -0700 (GMT-07:00); Thanks Chuck, and to the rest of the towertalk list members who replied to me - this is just the info I was looking for. Unfortunately, the one I'm looking at picking up doesn't have the tilt over ba; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00104.html (11,676 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wilson Crankup Tubular Tower Info Request (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 16:18:46 -0400; My sense is that "wrestling down" a 425+ lb load could be very dangerous. You might consider hiring an excavator or bucket loader with an experienced operator to lift the tower off the base and place; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00105.html (13,325 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]