Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wires\s+on\s+Freestanding\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wires\s+on\s+Freestanding\s+Towers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Wires on Freestanding Towers (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:59:13 -0500; I read on the reflector that it's not a good idea to guy a freestanding tower, because of forces applied that the tower is not designed to handle. On that same basis, is it OK to use a free-standing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00844.html (7,505 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wires on Freestanding Towers (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:12:14 -0700; I will defer on the guying issue as there are more qualified folks to answer. I think it would depend on the manufacturer. I don't think the end of a wire dipole on the tower is going to cause any tr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00849.html (8,606 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wires on Freestanding Towers (score: 1): Author: "Robskel" <robskel@tx.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:12:25 -0600; What is the other end of the dipole tied to? In other words, is the tower relatively free to flex? I suggest using a bungee cord to attach one or the other end of the dipole to its anchor. You just d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00892.html (9,263 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]