Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+addendum\s+on\s+interaction\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+addendum\s+on\s+interaction\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] XM240 addendum on interaction (score: 1): Author: AA4NC@aol.com (AA4NC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 18:35:38 EDT; As I reported yesterday, I was extremely pleased overall with the Cushcraft XM240, especially the SWR curves. Today we mounted a 5L 6m beam 5' below and a 4L20m beam 11' below the XM240. Even at thes; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00275.html (7,679 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] XM240 addendum on interaction (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider, N3RR); Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 22:50:25 +0100; You can easily model this situation. These distances are VERY close. And if your SWR is affected by adding another antenna, you can bet that your pattern is distorted to beat the band. I've done lots; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00276.html (9,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]