Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+and\s+Tribander\s+Stacking\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+and\s+Tribander\s+Stacking\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] XM240 and Tribander Stacking (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (K1ZM@aol.com); Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 06:03:14 EDT; Hi Guys I have been reading the mail on this subject and would like to offer my recent experience: 1) The new Cushcraft XM240 does indeed differ slightly from its forerunner - the 402CD. It has an in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00317.html (11,385 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] XM240 and Tribander Stacking (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:33:03 -0600; Another potential problem that can occur when close-stacking a 2 el 40 is that the unused feedline dangling off the 40m driven element can cause that element to become near-resonant on one of the tri; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00326.html (7,611 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]