- 1. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com)
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:19:04 EST
- Howdy! Before I would lay down my hard earned cash, for a ZR3, (dipole design) that essentially lays on the ground, I would seriously look at an attic dipole. It is real easy to poke a hole in the sh
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00531.html (7,710 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:29:35 -0600
- Counterpoints if you please. I have tried every kind of attic antenna there is: dipoles, folded dipoles, G5RV, 8JK's, J-poles, Isotrons, aluminum tape on the windows, ad infinitum, and at one locatio
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00532.html (10,591 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com)
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 18:45:38 EST
- John: Your point of RFI is well taken! Back in the era when I was putting antennas in attics, there was not this proliferation of CPU based products. I agree with your 3 dB down comment on attic moun
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00535.html (7,375 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu