Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+am\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+am\s+towers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:01:45 -0500; Cell sites are nothing. An AM array proof of performance has 20 radials, with 10 readings each... out to a distance of 8-10 miles. Lot of labor involved. and that was a lifetime ago... labor isn't an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00357.html (7,014 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: Bill MacLane <ai4wm@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:32:43 -0800 (PST); Yea, and they are straight line distance or air miles. I walked many of them...fun! 73, Bill AI4WM Cell sites are nothing. An AM array proof of performance has 20 radials, with 10 readings each... o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00364.html (7,810 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:21:39 -0800; The number of radials depends on the complexity of the pattern. A complex pattern may be protecting stations in a half dozen or more directions, each with a null. In essence, the proof must confirm t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00372.html (7,841 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: "D.Calder" <towertalk@n4zkf.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:02:55 -0500; Putting up a 350' tower 1/4" mile from a AM station is nothing? n4zkf Cell sites are nothing. An AM array proof of performance has 20 radials, with 10 readings each... out to a distance of 8-10 miles; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00388.html (8,100 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:15:23 -0500; not what I meant, Don. The tower is substantial. Whatever 'proof' was performed was minimal, if they only charged you $1200: It really depends on the nature of the AM array. If it were an omni situat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00391.html (9,651 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:24:23 -0800; I wonder if this has gotten easier/faster these days with GPS, automated measurement equipment, better calibration techniques for the probe, and so forth. I would think that today, measurement valida; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00398.html (10,405 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] am towers (score: 1): Author: "D.Calder" <towertalk@n4zkf.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:01:35 -0500; I think we a "large" discount with the amount we do a year. I have to admit. Dave From: jim Jarvis [mailto:jimjarvis@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 8:15 AM To: D.Calder; towertalk@con; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00447.html (9,889 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]