Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+height\s+and\s+LOCATION\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+height\s+and\s+LOCATION\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] antenna height and LOCATION (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 13:33:19 -0400; The discussion on antenna height is interesting and shows that location must be considered in the formula for EACH station. I visited Frank, W4AMJ (still spry at 91) , this past May and all he has is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00758.html (8,201 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] antenna height and LOCATION (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 14:07:52 -0400 (EDT); N4RJ did use a 4 high stack of 4 element Cushcraft 10's once. We decided that the performance of this stack was not up to snuff. The same was determined for the 4 high stack of 15's. What we finally; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00760.html (8,144 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] antenna height and LOCATION (score: 1): Author: kz5qdx@communique.net (Douglas Bradford); Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 11:16:19 -0500; If you come up with a antenna that radiates and gives full coverage on a 100' wire and No Tuner you can retire. Even with a tuner, signals will not be much. I think I would scratch 160 and 80 and put; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00784.html (9,313 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]