Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+impedance\s+anomaly\s+$UNDO$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+impedance\s+anomaly\s+$UNDO$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna impedance anomaly (UNDO) (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 10:15:13 -0700; -- Original Message -- > It has finally dawned on me of my mistake in equating the phase angle reported by EZNEC for the whole element was taken from the source data report and is the phase angle for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00718.html (8,393 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna impedance anomaly (UNDO) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 11:43:00 -0700; It has finally dawned on me of my mistake in equating the phase angle reported by EZNEC for the whole element was taken from the source data report and is the phase angle for the impedance i.e voltag; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00722.html (8,114 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]