Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+are\s+small\s+loops\s+in\s+beverages\s+bad\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+are\s+small\s+loops\s+in\s+beverages\s+bad\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] are small loops in beverages bad? (score: 1): Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>; Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:53:00 +0200; What do the beverage experts think about fixing the elongated beverage in the forest by running a few turns of the wire around the nail or branch that is used for it's support? Do you think it affect; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00777.html (7,625 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] are small loops in beverages bad? (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:20:24 -0700; Hi, Tonno. I'm not an expert but I doubt it would have any measurable effect. It's easier, though, to simply run the wire under each support and use separate pieces of wire to tie the beverage wire t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00788.html (9,083 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] are small loops in beverages bad? (score: 1): Author: Paul Kelley N1BUG <paul.kelley.n1bug@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:37:37 -0500; Tonno, I have tried hanging my Beverages the way you suggest and also without any such loops. I could see no difference in performance. But, I had more problems with broken Beverages when it was loop; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00790.html (9,364 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] are small loops in beverages bad? (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:03:55 +0000; Those small "coils" serve as VHF / UHF parasitic suppressors..... :-) Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00820.html (7,975 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]