Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+coax\s+and\s+phasing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+coax\s+and\s+phasing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] coax and phasing (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:15:20 -0700; When phasing a pair of verticals a 1/2 wave apart and forcing equal currents by using two 3/4 wave 50 ohm coaxes to a T connector does it matter if RG8X for the 3/4 wave portions is used if the freq; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00271.html (7,403 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] coax and phasing (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 22:30:37 -0700; RG8X is OK for the individual phasing lines. Each handles 1/2 of your power output. Do you plan to switch directivity 90 deg. by connecting the verticals either in phhase or 180 deg out of phase? Its; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00272.html (8,579 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] coax and phasing (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:37:36 -0500; I would not try to push more than 500 watts @ 20m through the RG-8X, Lane. Otherwise, no problem. Remember the velocity factor is different from solid dilectric coax ((RG-214) GL! Phil, K5PC -- FAQ o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00285.html (8,200 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] coax and phasing (score: 1): Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:58:15 -0500; Actually, this can work fairly well. I have a full size Carolina Windom (265 ft). It is designed with 22 ft of RG8X hanging down to a "line isolator". Mine is hanging over a big farm pond, so I could; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00288.html (8,445 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]