Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+current\s+balance\s+in\s+ladder\s+line\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:48:58 -0800
I'm using a ladder line fed 80m dipole as an all band antenna with a tuned length of line, high Z 1:1 choke at the LL to coax junction. One assumption in these antennas kinda baffles me, so here is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00250.html (7,267 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:29 +0000
Grant, The 1:1 choke at the ladderline/coax junction will impede conducted CM current from flowing back along the outside of the coax sheath. That will drive equal and opposite leg currents in the la
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00267.html (9,047 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:46:52 -0500
Well, it isn't always. You are right to question that assumption. Given a center fed dipole, which is physically a pretty good mirror image (not a sloper, or one end running to a metal roof when the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00282.html (8,562 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:09:38 -0800
If there's only two terminals, the current is, by definition, balanced at that point. What might not be balanced is the current *distribution* and any currents that are induced on nearby objects (e.g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00285.html (8,344 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:03:11 +0000
The problem is that the moment we attach a feedline to the feedpoint we have the potential for unbalancing the currents because there's another path for the antenna CM current to take. It's very inst
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00289.html (9,819 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:04:14 +0000
But there aren't only two terminals at the output from a transmitter/ATU into a "balanced" feedline. There are always three terminals - the third being the transmitter's ground terminal. It is the gr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00290.html (11,040 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:08:56 -0500
"Two terminals" is fine on paper. But you never have two terminals. You always have "ground", and who knows what else. Take your balanced feedline and move the wires together so they touch, and now y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00354.html (10,224 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] current balance in ladder line? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:36:14 -0800
More correctly, we have WIRES of finite length (called a feedline), often connected to the earth via the transmitter. Those wires do NOT represent, nor do they act, as GROUND. Rather, they are simply
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00362.html (10,920 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu