Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+decoupling\s+RF\s+from\s+control\s+lines\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:36:18 -0400
I am dealing with some pesky rf in control lines to a remote antenna switch. I'm thinking that an RF choke in series and bypass cap to ground on each line would help. My question -- are .1 mfd and 10
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00333.html (7,596 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:54:50 +0000
Pete: I used 1000 uH chokes in the DC-over-coax feed system for my EWE relay boxes on 160M. The value was cited in several feed designs I researched at that time. I bought conformal coated chokes fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00334.html (8,439 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:06:51 -0500
Pete -- take a look at the following link, which is an applications note I wrote for audio system RF suppression. The chokes described would work quite nicely to suppress common mode current on those
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00335.html (8,769 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:21:10 -0400
Thanks, Jim - The control cable I'm using is CAT-3 network cable. In the TopTen convention, six of these lines go direct to the band decoder, where they are "sunk" to ground by the decoder. The 7th a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00337.html (10,167 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:58:22 -0700
Of more interest might be what the properties of those capacitors and inductors are at HF frequencies. I assume you're not using microwave chip-caps, for instance, so that 0.1 uF cap might well look
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00347.html (8,856 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:13:51 -0400
used for 13 volts out to the relay box. The .1 caps were suggested by TopTen for best effectiveness at 160, but what I was really unsure of was the inductance of the RF chokes. I'll certainly have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00351.html (9,824 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:27:35 -0400
RFI in an LV system is not actually the problem here, Tom -- what I'm dealing with is RF cross-talk between two TopTen 6-way relay boxes in an SO2R setup. When I bring one 6-way physically close to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00355.html (10,896 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] decoupling RF from control lines (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:12:25 -0400
when I bring one 6-way near the control lines of the other. kit, and can get 10-15 turns of wire through each - would this be an appropriate sort of choke to try on the control leads? Maybe. You'll
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00366.html (8,960 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu