Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+different\s+OCF\s+dipoles\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+different\s+OCF\s+dipoles\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] different OCF dipoles? (score: 1): Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:20:51 +0000; Hello all, I am thinking of abandoning an original idea for a fan inverted-L and instead going for a windom/ocfd. I saw a few mfg of these for up to 80m and while they both had very similar total len; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00017.html (7,177 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] different OCF dipoles? (score: 1): Author: "w9nhq@myway.com" <w9nhq@myway.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:49:16 -0400 (EDT); I have used the Buckmaster high-power OCF Dipole for nearly a year and it works quite well - for a multi-band dipole. It is based on the (German) Fritzel FD-4 antenna and uses a 6:1 balun at the feed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00026.html (10,428 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] different OCF dipoles? (score: 1): Author: "mryan001" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:20:32 -0400; I have seen a number of these over the years. I have no real reason to want a multi-band dipole myself but is there an advantage to having this type of antenna ( with it's supposed vertical propertie; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00033.html (12,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]