Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+elevated\s+anchor\s+guy\s+points\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: garyejones@cmaaccess.com
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:34:11 -0700
I purchased a house last year as a compromise house that was OK but didn't have some things (like more land) that I really wanted but I needed to get into a house for a new job in a new city. I still
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00544.html (8,302 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:31:57 -0500
I use pipe. Each pipe is buried about 5 feet with a few inches of gravel at the bottom and about 4 yards of concrete. A friend who is also a CE for the county came by to see the installation just aft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00545.html (10,623 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:44:16 +0000
Gary: I have engineered at least a 100 installations you are describing. Using a Steel W section or some Pipe or Structural tubing if sized correctly does not need to be back guyed. The UBC or IBC in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00546.html (10,997 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:24:49 -0400 (EDT)
"maybe" it has enough dead weight that if on top of the ground it would resist being pulled sideways. but would it have enough overturning force for a lever arm of however many feet stick up from the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00547.html (12,797 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:22:34 -0500
Interesting point. The block that is underground is approximately 3 feet wide and 5 feet long (in direction of guy) if memory serves. Anybody on this list that can figure the lateral force required t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00548.html (14,170 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:57:18 -0400
What is the soil's bearing capacity and how deep is the top of the concrete block? You have several components of force: 1) the force required to tip over the block if it was setting on the surface
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00560.html (8,917 bytes)

7. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:44:49 -0000
Underground it is a much harder problem for all those reasons. My comments were in response to the off hand comment about it being enough even if it was on top of the ground. Try the calculation with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00563.html (11,843 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:09:54 -0400
Joe Subich, K4IK wrote: Interesting point. The block that is underground is approximately 3 feet wide and 5 feet long (in direction of guy) if memory serves. Anybody on this list that can figure the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00569.html (10,247 bytes)

9. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:17:40 -0500
Just went out to measure the top, which took a bit of digging as it is about 6 inches below ground level. Looks to be 4 feet by 5 feet by 5 1/2 feet deep. Soil is sandy loam to 3 feet, then iron ore
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00570.html (9,881 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "ISP BNJCOMP COM" <isp@bnjcomp.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:46:12 -0500
Hank, You talked about how far in ground and how much above and how much concrete. What I would like to hear additional about is the sizes of the "dead arms" that you considered sufficient. Pipe? 3"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00572.html (14,217 bytes)

11. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:51:22 -0400
TT'ers, How about using railroad rails? I see 15-20 pieces scattered along the train tracks. Would these be the ticket? Rex K1HI Hank, You talked about how far in ground and how much above and how mu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00574.html (14,875 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:23:17 -0000
There's a lot of information in the archives including nice summary by WE9V: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00209.html I purchased a house last year as a compromise h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00577.html (11,131 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu