Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+force\s+12\s+stacks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+force\s+12\s+stacks\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] force 12 stacks (score: 1): Author: rjbro@MISNET.COM (Richard J Brown); Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 20:03:21 -0600; What is the advisability of stacking a force 12 WARC 7 8 or 10 feet above a C-4SXL to cover all the bands?. Redundancy on 12 and 17 but don't like operating with the SWR the C4SXL has on 12 and 17..; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg01006.html (7,161 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] force 12 stacks (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 12:48:06 +0000; 1) Take a careful set of SWR and if possible front to back measurements before starting . 2) If after installation, the original measurements on the C4 are degraded you can turn the WARC 7 90 degrees; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg01007.html (7,753 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] force 12 stacks (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 07:12:28 -0600; I have a WARC7 in between a C3 and C4XL stack, with about 15' spacing from it to the other antennas. As I remember, Tom told me to get 10' or more of spacing to avoid problems. I see no interaction.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg01008.html (7,820 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]