Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guying\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guying\s+question\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 07:29:56 -0600; On Sun, 26 Sep 1999 07:59:56 -0400 "Barry Martz" <k8bk@speedconnect.com> writes: Why 8 ft? Look at your insulator to insulator distances. 8 ft from the first insulator, 1 ft across the tower, 8 ft to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00001.html (8,116 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: k8bk@speedconnect.com (Barry Martz); Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 07:59:56 -0400; Hi all I am getting set to put a new antenna on my Rohn tower. I was thinking about making some changes to the guy wires before I install the antenna. I would like to know what, if any, would make mu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00595.html (8,220 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 07:23:38 -0500; My Phillystran runs from the top down to 10 feet above the ground. You do not want to run it so near the ground that a grass or brush fire underneath it will melt it. Your can connect it to your ste; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00596.html (7,673 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 18:54:03 EDT; Vandalism is the other reason to have Phillystran out of reach. Ten feet off the ground sounds okay. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towert; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00601.html (7,863 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 20:30:01 EDT; Tower type? Antenna load? Windspeed zone? Doesn't sound like you'll be doing anything too aggressive so sounds reasonable. I wouldn't. I think that Phillystran won't be a big improvement over what yo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00602.html (8,737 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:50:41 -0500; My test was "well out of reach of a teenager standing on top of his pickup". I decided on this test after my neighbor reported seeing a truckload of teenagers hop over the fence at my remote site one; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00603.html (8,351 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 01:18:23 EDT; May madness? I found a high school card like you find in graduation announcements stuck in the top of a tower where I was changing the lights once. And while rare, vandalism can cause a catastrophe t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00609.html (8,223 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Guying question (score: 1): Author: n5tw@igg-tx.net (Tom Whiteside); Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:47:54 -0500; My question relates to how widely I can space guy wires on a Rohn 45 tower. I would like to go beyond the approximately 0.8 ratio suggested by Rohn to accommodate the turning radius of a beam that wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00583.html (7,581 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Guying question (score: 1): Author: froberts@pe.net (Fred Roberts); Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 13:44:52 -0700; Tom Like the ad says, "Wider is better". The figures quoted might better be defined as the "minimum recommended. My guess is that most people would like to have the anchors closer to the tower, if th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00606.html (8,930 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Guying Question (score: 1): Author: "Tom Crothers" <tcrothers@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:48:22 -0400; Hi Tower Talkians, I've never owned a guyed tower, so I don't know much about tower guying, however I'm curious about something. On a commercial tower near my home, I've noticed the rings at differen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00653.html (7,149 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:40:31 -0500; This is something kinda new to me.I'm going to use a torque bracket for the top most guy set on 2 of my towers.I've never used these before.It seems the bracket gets clamped around the tower.Do you n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00678.html (7,262 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:16:18 -0400; The bracket is the same bracket that *should* be used to attach the normal guys. With my 45G the only difference is the hardware that goes into the ends of the brackets. At each tower leg there is a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00681.html (8,702 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:04:59 -0400; Star guying substantially reduces the twist on a tower. Torque arms are much less effective. According to K7LXC : When Rohn implemented one of the early EIA/TIA-222 tower standards, they found that t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00687.html (8,575 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:23:12 -0400; I agree on both points. With this I disagree to a point. Much depends on how the torque arms are installed, but at best they are no where near as good as star guying. On my tower I found that followi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00689.html (8,096 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: "JoeCoolDXer" <JoeCoolDXer@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:42:43 -0700; Some tower twist is good, you don't necessarily want it totally rigid. During big wind gusts, it reduces shock loads on the rotator gear train, and tendency for boom-to-mast clamp to slip on the mast; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00740.html (9,911 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:04:59 EDT; During big wind gusts, it reduces shock loads on the rotator gear train, and tendency for boom-to-mast clamp to slip on the mast. Huh? Give us some real info. How much twist? To what standard? What s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00757.html (8,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]