Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+hdbx\s+or\s+hbx\?\s+Or\s+neither\?\s+$long\,\s+sorry$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+hdbx\s+or\s+hbx\?\s+Or\s+neither\?\s+$long\,\s+sorry$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] hdbx or hbx? Or neither? (long, sorry) (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.); Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:22:19 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0004_01BE4A11.363B2DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm in the EARLY planni; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00493.html (12,591 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] hdbx or hbx? Or neither? (long, sorry) (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:34:57 EST; << My question (finally) is whether Rohn HBX, Rohn HDBX, or something else would be the tower to do the job? I know neither tower is recommended for boom lengths greater than 10' (the T-6 is 12' and; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00497.html (8,490 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] hdbx or hbx? Or neither? (long, sorry) (score: 1): Author: csudds@probe.net (Chuck Sudds); Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:28:17 -0600; Hi Lou! As one who has already been through this dilemma, let me offer one small piece of advice: DON'T DO IT! When Rohn states that this series of self-supporting tower should not be used with anten; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00503.html (8,939 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]