Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+hexagonal\s+beams\s+and\s+height\s+above\s+ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+hexagonal\s+beams\s+and\s+height\s+above\s+ground\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] hexagonal beams and height above ground (score: 1): Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:53:22 -0800 (PST); Has anyone modeled hexagonal beams with regard to height above ground? I am very leery of the statements that they perform better when lower to the ground, specifically that on 20m, a height of 40 fe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00078.html (7,068 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] hexagonal beams and height above ground (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:01:28 +0000; Jim, It behaves just like any other horizontal antenna: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/hexbeam/height_2/ 73, Steve G3TXQ On 07/03/2013 15:53, Jim Hoge wrote: Has anyone modeled hexagonal beams with reg; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00079.html (7,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]