Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+info\s+on\s+radials\s+repartition\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+info\s+on\s+radials\s+repartition\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] info on radials repartition... (score: 1): Author: VE2RYY <ve2ryy@globetrotter.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:11:31 +0000; Hello I am using a 2 element phased vertical (towers) on 80 meters.There are about 75 radials under each tower for 80M. Now I want to use only one of these towers for 160 meter.... I Want to add radi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00240.html (7,613 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] info on radials repartition... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:10:45 -0700; The potential problem is that if you add radials to only one tower, the DIFFERENCE between the two towers will screw up the pattern on 80 by unbalancing that array. If it were my antenna system, I wo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00246.html (8,358 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] info on radials repartition... (score: 1): Author: VE2RYY <ve2ryy@globetrotter.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:18:53 +0000; Hello Jim That sound logical for me. I was afraid to screw up the pattern on my 80 meter array by adding more radials under only one tower.... Thanks very much for your input.Appreciate it very much.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00247.html (9,320 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]